Iliana Yotova and Andrey Gyurov confronted each other over Russia, Ukraine and presidential responsibility in their televised debate on 29 October. The discussion replaced campaign expectations with a direct comparison of their positions before the 1 November runoff.
Gyurov argued that Russia must be identified as the aggressor and that Bulgaria needs a clearer security response. He challenged the suggestion that the election should be presented as a choice between war and peace.
Yotova stressed negotiations involving Russia as the route to a lasting settlement. She argued that further military support for Ukraine brings more casualties. These are the candidates’ political positions, not findings that the debate itself establishes.
Attacks on commercial vessels in the Black Sea brought the disagreement closer to Bulgaria. Yotova proposed a regional security discussion and a moratorium on fighting at sea. Gyurov pressed for stronger protection against drones and questioned delays in Bulgaria’s response.
The candidates also disputed the meaning of political backing. Yotova raised support associated with parties behind Gyurov; he denied seeking support from party leaders and said his appeal was to citizens. Allegations exchanged in a debate should not be reported as independently established facts.
The office at stake can influence public debate, diplomacy and national security consultations, but a presidential election does not itself settle the operational or diplomatic decisions discussed. Voters now have the candidates’ contrasting approaches to weigh before Sunday’s ballot.
Updated on 29 October 2026 with the latest verified developments. The original publication date, URL and image are retained.
